In article <5papgd$53k@news.wcc.net>, "R.D.Young@wcc.net"@wcc.net says...
>Jim wrote:
>> Bob Y. wrote:

>> > Is there a good substitute for the old Kodak Panatomic-X on the market?

>> Have you tried Ilford's Pan F?

>No, but I will.

You may also find T-Max 100 shot at 40 ASA and processed in D76 1:1
(about the same way you would do it if it were Tri-X shot at 400...)
interesting... It is not always reliable, but it is VERY high-quality
when successful. Even less reliable, but often better yet is Technical
Pan shot at 20 ASA and processed in _liquid_ Technidol...
Hope This Helps
(David Ruether - http://www.fcinet.com/ruether )