On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 12:21:40 -0700, Ed Bianchi wrote:

>Good to hear more positive results - I have not given up on this lens, even
>with the photodo results. Given that some Sigma's have produced excellent
>scores (like the 28-70 2.8 EX) and some here do not like the Sigma's, I'd
>say there is more to it than the testing that photodo does; argh! Just
>makes it more complicated to find the right lenses....

I find "objective" lens tests often miss the point: what the
images *look* like... On my web site, under "I babble" is
a *subjective* Nikkor evaluation list (and reviews of both
the 28-105 and 24-120 - I preferred the 24-120...). If you
find it useful and in general agreement with your findings
and experience, why not post the URL occasionally so others
can find it?
http://imperium.bayside.net/ruether/articles.html

I was on this group rather too much for a couple of years,
and must now be elsewhere - if bits of what I had to offer
(that are now on my web page) are useful, it would help if
you and others pointed out where they can be found.
Thanks.