In article
>I recently decided not to renew my subscription to Outdoor
>Photographer, for this precise reason. The technical content is next
>to nil, and I think the photo editors are in a rut, the photography >seems very homogenous with little in the way of original vision.
Yuh, I hafta agree - besides they just turned down five (5) great
article proposals of mine (along with the even greater photographs
that were to go with them ;-). But at least their payment schedule
is pleasant if you do sell to them, unlike Nature Photographer,
which must figure that the, ah, honor of being published is
sufficient payment. There doesn't seem to be a lot of room for publishing in photography these days - the "duffer" oriented
Shutterbug isn't very appealing (if it weren't for their computer articles, there would be little but the ads.), and then there is
Pop Photography..... Ah. well.
Hope This Helps