On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:19:01 -0800, "Paul Tauger" wrote:
>"Neuman - Ruether" wrote in message
>news:3c6a5649.4117881@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...

>> You can use the "motion" tool, or the "pan" filter - but
>> best results are often had shooting the stills (with the
>> motions) with the video camera (the results can be smoother,
>> and generally better-looking).

>Don't use the "motion" tool -- it will distort the aspect ratio of the
>photograph, and you will lose resolution when you zoom.

You need not lose the proportion, depending on how you
use it, but you are right, you will lose resolution with
zooming with the motion tool.

>The "pan" tool is the way to go -- it will work with digital stills up to
>4,000 pixels x 4,000 pixels, can be constrained to maintain the correct
>aspect ratio, and will not lose resolution when you zoom.

I have had problems with "glittering" on edges.
This does not happen with images (slides or prints)
shot in camera, with zooms included (hard to do
zooming with slides, though...).