From: bossung@scmpop.de
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Subject: Re: UV filter
Date: 20 Feb 1997 11:18:04 GMT
Organization: HRZ Uni Marburg
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <5ehbtc$75v$5@surz03fi.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE>
References: <5draim$pjg@uni00nw.unity.ncsu.edu> <19970213012801.UAA20964@ladder01.news.aol.com> <01bc1a03$9078ef40$32dd66cf@Axion.axionet.com> <5e0o15$d63@lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu> <5e1tac$1j9@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: scmpop251.scm.de
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
>Then your statements will be based on facts.
Quoting 'fotoMagazin' (Germany):
ranges from 0 to 10:
- B+W UV MC: very good (8.8)
- B+W UV 010 (2C): superb (9.2)
- Canon UV: very good (8.4)
- Conty UV MC L39: very good (8.8)
- Danubia UV 310: good (7.6)
- Hama UV-390 700 good (7.8)
- Hama UV-390 706 HTMC: good (8.8)
- Hama UV-309 705 HTMC ghostless:fair (7.0)
- Helioplan UV (coated):good (8.0)
- Helioplan UV MC: very good (9.0)
- Hoya HMC Super: superb (9.2)
- Kaiser UV coated 101: good (7.8)
- Kaiser UV MC 102 very good (9.0)
- Leica UVa: superb (9.4)
- Minolta UV L37: very good (8.6)
- Nikon L39 (b/w only): very good (9.0)
- Nikon UV L37C: superb (9.2)
- Pentax UV L39 SMC: good (7.8)
- Rodenstock: very good (8.4)
- Rowi UV 9151 coat.: good (7.8)
- Rowi UV 9233 MC: very good (8.8)
- Soligor UV: good (7.4)
I got the hama UV-390 HTMC and it gives a good image quality (actually
you can't tell the difference between a picture with and without
(Sigma 50mm Macro)).
Sebastian
>Bob
>--
>HP Marketing Corp. Gepe, Giottos, Heliopan, HP Combi-Plan-T, Kaiser, Linhof,
Rimowa, Rodenstock, Rollei, Sirostar 2000