On Sun, 3 Feb 2002 10:13:33 +0800, "Gary PoIIard" wrote:
>"Erik J. Barzeski" wrote in message
>news:020220022050485726%erik@REMOVEanalogstick.com...

>> I'm a bit further now, and am still considering the XL-1S, as there
>> seems to be quite a gap between the highest-level "consumer" DV cameras
>> - around $1500 or whatnot - and the upper echelon of "prosumer"
>> devices, like the XL-1S. Someone mentioned the TRV-900 so I'll check
>> that out as well.

>The TRV 900 is a great camera, and I agree with those who think it's
>probably better for your puposes than a larger one, but according to my
>sources at Sony here in Hong Kong they have already ceased production of it.
>You might want to check this out for yourself. AFAIK the 900s on sale are
>not new off the production line. I think they'll still be supporting it for
>a few more years, but you might not want to jump in on a camera that's being
>phased out. It seems they are still manufacturing the PD100, which is the
>TRV 900's professional "brother", and also a damn good camera.

A good camera is a good camera - why worry if a
good model will be discontinued soon (or not...).
If it is a parts concern, it will be supported for
a while, and if the similar PD-100a remains in
production, parts will be available even longer...
For light amateur use, I think it is silly to worry
about discontinuance - buy and have fun using a good
camera (or wait forever for that "perfect" "latest
model"...;-). Often, as a good model is discontinued,
I realize the impending loss of availability of an
unused good model sample, and buy it then...;-)