None of the frame-grabs of the five current Sony
Mini-DV imaging types shows great variation in the
daylight frame-grabs, even though two of the
imaging types are 3-chip (and the TRV30 can be
corrected to resemble the VX2000 image - see:
www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm),
but if you look carefully, there are contrast and
saturation differences (and color-balance in the
case of the PC100, and sharpness in the case of the
PC9 - and better image "smoothness" with motion
with the two 3-chippers [not visible in the
stills] - and differing low-light handling...).
I currently own both the PC100 and TRV30, and I like
the images from both (when motion with contrasty
edges don't spoil them, and there is enough light
to get a good image), and deciding which to sell
has been not easy...;-)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 03:56:24 +0100, "peter nederveld"
>Hi David
>Thanks again for the URL
>I did study the tekst maticiously.
>It is of good value (the tekst).
>
>So the difference between the pc100 and the pc120 is not much
>only the color tone looks cooler with the pc100
>And the increase of pixels in the ccd does not have much effect towards the
>video quality.
>
>Peter Nederveld
> from Holland
>tandarts@kabelfoon.nl
>"Neuman - Ruether"
>news:3c3f8ab5.2965079@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:55:08 +0100, "peter nederveld"
>>
>>
>> >At the moment i have a Sony PC100
>> >The camera is performing fine
>> >the video quality is good.
>> >Only there is burning sometimes in the light parts, especially with sun
>and
>> >shadow.
>> >Sony PC120
>> >i think the stabilizer is better.
>> >digital zoom is more usable
>> >the zoom control is better.
>> >all in compare to the PC100
>> >My questions are.
>> >With the PC120, is it true that the video quality is better.
>> >Or can you find back the increase in pixels of the ccd chip only at
>stills
>> >
>> >I would like to have contact with someone knowing or pocessing the PC120
>> You can find comparison frame grabs from the PC100
>> and TRV30 (PC120...) at:
>> www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm
>> I like/dislike the video images from both for
>> (mostly) the same reasons...