On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:42:35 -0700, "John Peterson" wrote:

>Thanks, David!
>I appreciate your comments in this, and the other, thread! I didn't realize
>that the DV950 was similar to the EZ30U. (I *did* check your website for
>any comments and didn't see the DV950 and assumed that you hadn't reviewed
>it.) [website at: www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder-comparison.htm ]
>However, based on your comments in the other thread, it sounds as if, while
>you liked many of the features of the EZ30U, you still feel that the TRV900
>is a more versatile camera overall. Is this accurate, in your opinion?

Yes. I liked much about the EZ30U (DV950), but
overall, I preferred the TRV-900 (with trade-offs
in these roughly equal camcorders - and someone
might easily go the other way...) for what I shoot.
BTW, other camcorders covered have equivalents (at
least for image characteristics) not listed, i.e.,
VX-1000 = DSR-200, VX-2000 = PD-150 and DSR 250,
EZ30U = DV950 and ???10, and the TRV-900 = PD100a
(and the GL-1 is the XM-1).