On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 13:26:24 +0800, "Gary Pollard" wrote:
>"Jim Harvey" wrote in message
>news:DWNY8.48225$6r.1580436@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
>> If you so vehemently disagree that content and talent trumps technology
>> EVERY TIME, then you must make incredibly boring, sterile stuff.....

>I certainly disagree with the "every time" part.
>
>Otherwise why aren't we all shooting Pixelvision? Or single CCD? Why was
>"Titanic" shot on Super 35mm? (Of course that could be - in my view -
>because it had crap content.)
>
>Many people ARE interested in getting the most bang for the buck,
>particularly with a technology where you are producing borderline
>broadcastable results.
>
>Sure, it's reasonable to CHOOSE a camera that might be technically less
>adept for certain tasks - look at the Lomo craze. But some people just seem
>to get mad when limitations (call them characteristics if you like) of
>whichever camera they prefer are mentioned.
>
>If they really don't matter to some here, why are they so pissed that people
>have the option to make an informed decision rather than an uninformed one?
>
>Surely, against the inflated claims of manufacturers, a little reality is
>sometimes a welcome thing.
>
>Gary

Amen....;-)