On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:08:02 -0500, Stacey wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:48:54 GMT, "Freddy Vegas"
> wrote:

>> Subjective and market based. If pure digital is king
>>than why is so much time spent on achieving "film look" or sweetening audio
>>to sound "warmer"?

>Just a thought, maybe the same reason people add "grain" filters to
>digital photographs? Trying to make their videos/photographs look like
>the more respected "film" industry or maybe just to give it a familiar
>look/sound?
>Stacey

[Oh, heck, I can't resist... (I'm a "recovering
audiomaniac" - see the "audio" section on my
web page, at www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/Audio.html,
for proof...!;-)]

And add canvass texture and brush-stroke marks to
still photographs, and silly scratches and dust
and image "wobble" to video...;-) Audio did teach
me things about perceptions, though - one can
"hear" just about anything one wants, whether it
is really there or not...;-)