On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 05:51:15 GMT, John Beale wrote:

>
>There are a few image comparisons here (not by me) including GL2 and VX2k:
>http://www.bealecorner.com/trv900/trv950/images1.html
>
>The VX2k is the winner in low light. I don't have sufficient data to say
>much about normal-light performance.
>
>I saw the GL2 in a store briefly, not powered on. Physically it is just
>about the same as the GL1 although it has some more controls- there are
>separate physical controls for left and right audio level. That makes it
>one of very few non-"pro" cameras to offer such audio control.
>
>-john
>www.bealecorner.com

This comparison (first part) is interesting for comparing
low-light limits (order: VX2000, GL2, TRV900, TRV950, from
best to worst) and noise for the gain used at the particular
light level, but something is amiss in the frame-grabbing
that is causing odd effects (unexpected blur, and in the
case of the GL2-1 image, "tipped" type on the CD cases(!).
I was a bit mystified by the TRV900/950 at 1/30th in bright
light comments...