On 21 Dec 2002 15:48:06 GMT, bjeanneb@aol.comnospam (Bjeanneb) wrote:
>>From: d_ruether@hotmail.com (Neuman - Ruether)

[...]
>> see
>>www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm
>>for a comparison of the images of these two
>>with other Sony *imaging types* in three
>>different lighting conditions). I
[...]

>Thank you for your reply. I always read your posts because I consider you to
>have the most accurate and helpful information in the newsgroup. However, I
>need particularly to have the PC-100 because it is the only camcorder which
>fits my underwater housing. I'd feel more secure having a backup in case the
>housing lasts longer than the camcorder, a most likely situation.
>~*~*~ Jeanne ~*~*~

Thanks for the comments. BTW, the PC100 image tends
to look best with lower-contrast lighting (and it can
look VERY good then...), so it should look good shooting
underwater...