On 26 Jun 2002 15:15:03 +0200, Christoph Breitkopf wrote:

>d_ruether@hotmail.com (Neuman - Ruether) writes:
>
>> Perhaps the terms should be changed from "bad bokeh"
>> and "good bokeh" to something else - some of us
>> prefer "bad bokeh" for its better universal DOF
>> and point-source light image possibilities (see
>> http://www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/sunplant1.html
>> for examples of the latter), and for its "hard-edged"
>> very-sharp look, and often do not prefer "good bokeh"
>> for its sometimes "mushy" look...

>hard bokeh <-> soft bokeh ?
>harsh bokeh <-> creamy bokeh ?
>
>Any other suggestions?
>
>Regards,
>Chris

Dunno - mebbe just "overcorrected spherical aberration"
vs. "undercorrected spherical aberration"..., or,
OCSA <-> UCSA...? ;-)
(Almost sounds Japanese, too......! ;-)