Easy, the PC120, unless minimum size is absolutely
critical...

>I am trying to decide which of the two is better. Difference is about
>$400 more in price for the 120bt.
>
>I'm still not sure what the 680K pixesl in the IP5 versus the
>1.5megapixels in the pc120bt really means to the video quality.

Look at www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm
at the TRV30 (1.5-megapixel) and PC9 (680k-pixels) image
comparisons...

>Overal size they are pretty much the same, the pc120bt is a bit
>fatter. The IP5 takes MicroDV which compresses the video, so I would
>think their would be some video quality lossed compared to the pc120
>model.

Both compress the video, but the IP5 compresses it
more - and it is harder to get it into and out of
many video editors, in addition to the lower-quality
consideration...

>Please any thoughts on either would be appreciated. Thanks.

IP5 = cute toy; PC120 = good useable camcorder (under
ideal lighting conditions for it, that minimize its
image problems - soft light, with few contrasty edges
and textures work best...).