On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:53:38 -0800, Z_amatk wrote:

>Rich put it very nicely. I don't need to add to that.
>
>BTW all of this evidence, fact etc. etc. not being opinion, did you
>know at one point according to a lot of "experts" the world was flat?
>I'm sure they had tests as well.

Excellent example...! ;-)
The point is: they *didn't* test for it,
they simply *believed* without questioning...
It appears you have little faith in the
"Scientific Method" (a real thing, that I
do not claim to have used ;-) - but I do claim
to have set up a reasonable set of tests
through which the camcorders went. And
I not only published my observations and
conclusions, but also the "raw data" (best
I could on the web) so you and others could
see what I based some of my conclusions on.
If you choose to dismiss it, or disbelieve it,
or whatever, that is your choice, but if so,
it does lead one to believe that you would
have been one of those accepting the
"flat earth" premise way back then...;-)