On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:33:17 GMT, Shane K. McNeill wrote:

>For our business, we use two GL-1s and a VX2000. Me and a partner
>talk quit frequently how we would like to lose the VX2000. It's great
>in low light and in lots of light but not in between. The colors are
>fake and pinkish - very much like all Sony cameras that I've seen.
>The colors on the GL-1 are much much more realistic.
[...]

Unless your sample is pretty far out of adjustment, your
comment seems odd (I have two VX2000s, and the colors are
excellent in all conditions). BTW, you do have a warm/cool
color-bias control on the VX2000 plus useful presets in
addition to manual white balance... In EVERY picture
characteristic, the VX2000 is better than the GL-1
(resolution, contrast, relative freedom from artifacting,
color qiality, low-light ability, etc.), not to mention
its audio superiority. There are reviews, with frame-grabs, in the following:
The Sony models are compared at:
www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm
Other model comparisons are at:
www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder-comparison.htm
and:
www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/sony_dcr-vx2000.htm
and:
www.bealecorner.com
and:
http://www4.big.or.jp/~a_haru/index.html