In article <19970330070601.CAA07882@ladder01.news.aol.com>, rxwho@aol.com says...

>Anybody work with this film? I was wondering how it was, particularly the
>ISO 100.

I have some, but I have never used the 100...
The 400 is wonderful in D76 1:1 (with the same time/temperature/agitation
as used with Tri-X for 400), exposed at 250 - fine, open, detailed shadows result, but without the "flat" look resulting from pulling Tri-X. It also
works well at 400 with slightly increased development. Fuji 1600 was
disappointing, being barely 800, and contrasty at that...
Hope This Helps