On 24 Jul 2001 00:10:02 +0100, woobman wrote:

>in article info-2307011641590001@192.168.1.5, info@internet-real-estate.com
>at info@internet-real-estate.com wrote on 23/7/01 9:44 pm:
>> In article , woobman
>> wrote:

>>> ..... er, wrong! you can put in more 1's and 0's.... or are you trying to
>>> say DV is as good as Digi-Beta!?

>> I was saying there is no quality difference between DV LP or SP or DVCAM.
>> Tape "length capacity" (time) ... yes .... but not quality.
>> Edward

>I just don't get your understanding.... you're basically saying that (using
>digi cameras for eg) that a camera that shoots a 1.4 million pixel shot is
>equal 'quality' as one that shoots a 3.4 million one....!

No - you said originally that DVCam (which is essentially
the same format as Mini-DV (in either LP or SP mode, also
the same...) was higher quality, but it's not essentially
different - HD or any other higher quality format is
"clearly" different, but that wasn't the original issue
(apples 'n' oranges...;-).