It was mentioned, as the DSR 250 is mentioned, by me...;-)
The DSR200 had the "front end" of the VX1000 (and the same
picture); the DSR250 has the "front end" of the VX2000
(and the same picture); both had DVCam long-load tape
capacity and better VFs than their smaller non-shoulder-
mount brethren, plus XLRs, different controls, etc., but
they had/have the same very good pictures as their small
"handycam" counterparts...

On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:28:33 -0400, "Jim Harvey" wrote:

>I htought this was the professional forum too. As for the dsr-250, in my
>opinion, the dsr-200 appears to be MORE of a professional camera than the
>250 is. My question was why isn't this camera ever mentioned in the posts
>here. Is it still being made? Picture comparison to the other medium high
>end cameras? It seems to have some extremely nice features.

>Jim Harvey
>"Seattle Eric" wrote in message
>news:ahk3sm$mo4$1@216.39.143.76...
>> Andys cam wrote:
>>
>> > There are lots of happy users of the DSR 200 and DSR 250. Why do you
>think it
>> > 'dropped off the screen' ? The professional forums have a lot more
>postings
>> > about them.
>>
>> Isn't this the professional forum?