On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:49:04 -0400, "Dirk J. Bakker" wrote:
>Neuman - Ruether wrote:
>>On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 04:43:41 GMT, "nappy"
>> wrote:

>>>I agree with you David. The XL1 is a great camera.

>>????????????? ;-)
>>Uh-huh, an' the Yugo wuz a great car...!;-)

>And I take it THIS is your idea of useful contribution, to use your own
>words, "If you do not have a specific thing to add to the discussion
>topic that is relevant and can carry the exchange forward, perhaps you
>should consider the possibility of maybe beginning to rethink your
>additions of "monkey-wrench" OT additions to threads"?
>
>The above paragraph will be added to EVERY such 'contribution' that
>warrants it. Recall what I say about introspection.
>
>Here is the mirror. LOOK!

Oh, lighten up a bit already...!
I responded to a "joke" nonsense-post (that reversed
what I had said) with an in-kind post. Big deal...
As for contributions, I leave it to the readers to
decide which of us predominantly offers helpful and
substantive posts, and which offers mostly rabid
argumentativeness and personal attacks in defense of
the "honor" of a particular camcorder model...;-)