On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:41:01 -0400, "Dirk J. Bakker" wrote:

[...]
>The fact that you ALWAYS see the need to inject your 2 cents against the
>wishes of the initial poster illustrates your lack of simple respect for
>them and this group.
[...]

Hmmmm....
Gosh, I wonder why the original poster, YW, bothered to
write me and thank me for my input (as do most others,
BTW...)? I think you have a problem with anyone pointing
anyone to a product other than Canon... You really ought
to "cool it"...;-) And, as I pointed out before, others
on these groups can judge from our posts which of us
offers the more generally useful and helpful posts here...
If your purpose is simple interference with discussion
and information-giving, then you may accomplish that
(as you tried to do in this thread), but doing that would
hardly represent "simple respect...for this group". You
may want to examine your motives for what you are doing
in this (and other similar threads) more closely than
you have in the past, ugly as the results of that
introspection may unfortunately be...
My appologies to the group for getting personal here
with a poster, but at some point, it can be necessary
to "clear the air" of continuing nonsense and get on
with the discussion of *video* issues with less
interference...