On 2 Feb 1999 08:14:11 GMT, greenspam@aol.com (GREENSPAM) wrote:

>The majority of the people on this news group are good people that like to
>debate about camera equiptment. Then there is some people that fit the
>personality type of PAAL. Why do you feel a need to continue to bad mouth Bob
>Shell. I imagin it is because you are jelous of him and what he has acheived.
>I feel that an editor of a world wide published magazine is not going to
>mis-inform his readers, but of course you are right as always PAAL. Just
>remember, It is his responiciblity to convay the truth, how about you? Debate
>is one thing, slander is another.
>Please be good people,
>In all in case, Contax is just sharper.

Hmmmm, well.....
Believing the above is akin to believing everything you
read in the paper, I think (and I still have that
bridge for sale in Brooklyn, cheap, and it is in good
condition...! Interested? ;-).
As to BS, in a matter involving an article I wrote for
Shutterbug, BS told three distinctly different and
factually conflicting stories on these NG's about the
affair - which sure leads me to question the truth of
what BS says...
An', 'sides, Nikkors 'r' jes' playn sharpr! ;-)