In article <33288A53.10F0@ira.uka.de>, klaus_s@ira.uka.de says...
>Claus(:-} wrote:

>> But when you look into the FotoMagazine at the test results of the
>> 24-120 you will see they gave 4 of 5 stars and a very good.

>The only problem is that FoMag results are totally unreliable -
>there're just too many inconsistent ratings.
>Or how can you explain the 5 star rating of the cheapest Sigmas ?
>The 3 star rating from Chasseur d'Image is quite good for such
>a lens though. Overall a pretty average lens.

Hmmm..., the 24-120mm Nikkor I tried sure put to shame a rather
large number of Nikkor zooms that are generally highly regarded...
(And overall, I find the magazine lens "tests" in general highly
unreliable...)
Hope This Helps