On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:44:55 +0800, "Astley"
<astley@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
Some comments interspersed below...:
>Compare to DSR-250, DVC-200 or JVC5000... DSR-250 use
fix lens is a minus
>point...
In terms of manual-focus control and smooth zoom
start/stops, this is true - but in terms of sharpness,
the VX2000 lens reaches diffraction-limiting around f4,
and is excellent even wide open (and it is also low in
flare and has good contrast) - so in terms of optical
quality only, there should be not a lot of difference
(though a MUCH sharper lens will give a bit more on-tape
resolution shot wider than f4...).
>I have been in still photography for few years, I know
DVC and JVC use
>professional lenses and bigger CCD unit really can
capture high detail image
>and good color reproduction.
In terms of resolution, again there should be little
difference, since both are limited to 480x720 (or
about 540 TV lines horizontal), and the VX2000
approaches this limit fairly closely (with 520-530
lines at optimum stop). The larger CCD offers advantages
in tonality, though the difference between 1/3" and
1/2" chips is not great - and Sony uses "HAD" chips, with their
greater sensitivity (and, I think, slightly better color).
>But if you shoot your subject in still, you will get
really high quality
>image... if you shoot your image on the move or you move
your camera
>around.... you will create motion blur at your image....
>
>follow up with CCD system, sony use only 1/3" CCD,
compare to 1/2" CCD, DVC
>or JVC will capture more high quality image...
(See above...)
>but if we use the DSR-250 to doing the Wedding video
assignment... that is
>more than enough... mostly after shooting the wedding
video, I also will
>edit in NLE, the final output will be in VHS,S-VHS, MPEG
1 or MPEG 2
>format.(very rare to DVCAM or DV format - mostly my
customer don't have DV
>or DVCAM VTR !), with DSR-250 "Big" camera
look, customer will always
>say...your are Professional !
A bit of "advertising" before the shoot on
"how good these
newer, smaller digital cameras can be" may get you past
this...
>but for me, I will use this camera to do stage drama as
well... I was worry
>about the stage lighting problem... some situation,
VX2000 or (maybe
>DSR-250) may not handle the job well... DSR-250 maybe
can use to do some
>"point and shoot" or "Hit and Run"
fast job, but once come to the stage
>drame shoot.... I may have big problem...
The better tonality of the larger camera can help here...
>likewise wedding video assignment I can get $$$, but
stage drama video
>assignment... I can get $$$$$ !!...
>some more stage drame video mostly want DV or DVCAM
format, I has been shoot
>on DV format, and dub it to DVCAM format for TV station,
that was no
>problem... ( I also can't realize which one is from DV
or DVCAM format when
>seen it on TV monitor !!)
These formats are the same, in terms of video and audio
signal quality...
>for me, I will consider DSR-250 more than the other,
that is because DSR-250
>can have long battery run time if compare than DVC or
JVC, other than that,
>DSR-250 can record in two difference video format, four
difference type of
>video tape.
>some more I have VX2000 in hand, I can shoot with
DSR-250 and no need to
>worry about having difference video footage....
This can be very useful. You will likely see minor
differences, but these are easily corrected...
>for me, I also found VX2000 record audio very bad, I
don't like VX2000 on
>board mic, I use sennheiser K6+ME66 to record sound,
after all I use
>external pre-amp / mixer to push up the audio gain, I
use sound device
>(Mixpre) to mix and gain up my audio, in VX2000, I set
audio in manual in my
>VX2000, with K6+ME66 and Mixpre, you will have some head
room to control
>your audio into VX2000 or( maybe DSR-250?).... maybe you
can try to use
>other external mic to record ( no all OEM Sony mic..they
are BAD !!)...but
>do control in manual AGC.... it might be good in some
point !
????
For any "set-up" work, manual auto levels are
preferable,
as are proper mics for the job, but for many purposes,
the VX2000 built-in omni mic is excellent, as is the AGC...
With DV/DVCam, though, the headroom is non-existent, so
"pushing up the gain" while recording can have
disasterous
results (better to do this while editing, so you can
reduce the peaks to avoid clipping...).