"Andys
cam" <andyscam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030630184133.04179.00001287@mb-m28.aol.com...
>
>While I appreciate the mention, I gotta agree with Andy on the idea that
>
>there are lots of segments of the industry... some of whom (including
> >event
videographers) might have to get by with a camera-mounted mic,
>
>supplanted by wireless lav and/or plant mics.
Yes -
sometimes there is little or no time or possibility for placing
alternatives
to on-camera mics, and close-in (I like WA lens
converters
partly for this reason), a good on-camera mic can
suffice.
Some corrections are possible during editing, also...
>
>Also, the orignal quote was specifically talking about camera built-in
>
>mics, which generally are pretty awful; a good short shot on a shockmount
>
>is a definite improvement for those who must use a camera-mounted mic.
>
>(For those with the Second Edition of Producing Great Sound, it's on page
>
>123.)
There
are some situations where a stereo omni is more satisfactory than
a mono
shotgun - like when specific voice pickup is not needed, but
"ambience"
with stereo effect is; and when music is being recorded,
especially
if the quality of the music sound and its consistency as the
camera
is turned are important (omnis maintain much more consistent tonal
"color"
and amplitude with turning than do shotguns). Some cameras have
fairly
decent stereo omni mics built in (the VX1000/2000 do), which I
find
very useful for covering musical events, events with music, general
event
"ambience", nature material, street scenes, market scenes, etc...
>
>By the way, about 90% of my credits haven't made it to my website... does
>
>anyone really care that I once recorded ADR for Maxx Headroom?
Yes....;-)
>
Thank you Mr. Rose for helping with some additional clarity of this endless
>
debate. I did a wedding this weekend (I don't do many, by choice) and half way
>
through putting a Senn Evolution wirelesss on the groom, he said 'I don't want
> to
wear this' so I took it off. (his gig, not mine!) Fearing this or any other
>
audio problem I had already hid a D8 Camcorder (with a dreaded, on-cam shotgun)
> on
the alter/pulput/stage to catch audio only. (Martha Mary Chapel at the
>
historic Longfellow's Wayside Inn in Sudbury, MA) and of the 3 cams recording
>
audio, the dreaded, on-cam shotgun on my VX2000 in the alter/pulput/stage rear
>
doorway gave me the best audio. The second camera man in the balcony (PD-150)
>
ran manual audio and it was useless as the soft spoken stuff was inaudible and
>
the organ/singer was too loud.
I like
omnis when the placement is far from the "action" - the general sound
of the
place, and the music, are better picked up with these (in stereo),
and the
high noise level becomes the "hall sound" and a natural-sounding part
of the
final mix...
>The
D8 audio was fair but had a bit too much
>
motor noise in it.
The
Sony 908c is worth the price to get its decent broad-stereo sound, and
also
its usable compact shock mount that can be used with other mics.
Cool
Edit can help some with steady-state noise reduction, too...
>I
have tried a few different combos in my little event
>
corner (from PZMs to feeds) over the years and (again in my little corner) have
>
got the best, most rounded, most like it actually was audio from the dreaded
>
on-cam mikes. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
It's my
story, too...;-) One can mic for different ends. If you want a
quiet-background
"up-close" studio sound quality, you mic one way;
if you
want a natural-sounding mix (which includes lotsa "hall sound"
and
noise and good stereo spread - just lotsa good ambience, natural
reverb,
etc.) for the "you were there" feel, you mic another way...
BTW, I
used to record music - and my preferred method of micing
was the
use of two spaced omni mics (only), though this risked high
noise
levels - but it resulted in the most natural-sounding recordings
compared
with using other micing techniques...
--
David
Ruether
d_ruether@hotmail.com
http://www.David-Ruether-Photography.com
Hey,
take a gander at www.visitithaca.com, too...!