>Neuman - Ruether wrote:
>> On 3 Apr 2003 02:58:54 -0800,
tan_han_wee@hotmail.com
>> (rocketboy) wrote:
>>>Does anyone owned the Canon XL1s Camcorder? Just
want to check if
>>>it is a good camcorder. Pretty expensive - need
to do research first. Thanks!
>> Many of us consider it the "bottom of the
heap"
>> among current 3-CCD Mini-DV/DVCam camcorders.
>> Look instead at the Sony VX2000 (best buy),
>> PD150, TRV950, PDX10 (if into 16:9), Panasonic
>> DVX100, Canon GL2, JVC 300; in shoulder-mounts:
>> JVC 500/etc., Panasonic 200, Sony 300/etc.
>> (a well-equipped XL-1s can cost about as much
>> as a better JVC500, BTW...). I'm not sure why
>> people start their search with the worst, but
>> I suspect it is due to the good quality of the
>> "image" of the product as created by
advertising
>> more than the quality of the images it can
>> shoot...;-) ALL of the above camcorders above
>> produce better images, and do it more easily
>> than with the XL-1 - and given the several
>> XL-1 shortcomings, the base price is only
>> the beginning, not the final price, of a
>> decent working camera (with still-inferior
>> image-quality...).
>> David
Ruether
On Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:20:48 GMT, "Mark A. Smith"
<MrkyAmrky@netscape.net> wrote:
>He will trash Canon at any chance he gets, don't take
this as gospel. He
>is alone with his "many of us" statement.
Then you have obviously not read many of my posts
(or even the one above[!!] that you responded to,
where I recommend the Canon GL2), and you have not
read many of the responses by others to similar
threads on r.v.production... And you have not
actually read my XL-1 review at:
www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder-comparison.htm.
But, this is typical for the few "Canon-nuts"
on these NGs - they counter any criticism of
their "fav" with opinion and personal attack
rather
than presenting real observations about the gear
(with some evidence) - unlike owners of ANY other
brand gear...! ;-) Truth is not their aim;
unquestioning adoration for "their" favorite
camera is... This is not the stuff of good
reporting, though...