On Mon, 12 May 2003 18:39:58 +0000 (UTC), "Wayne
Youngman" <Big.Wayne@wardofpower.bigfoot.com> wrote:
>thanks for replies.
Yes I forgot to mention that I would need to buy a
>newer AF/AP metering lens. I wasn't expecting to be able to use my older
>lenses, but as you guys pointed out there is options to
still use them, good
>to know. Yes I
saw the FM3a on the Nikon site, looks interesting, nice
>price (£599).
The F5 looks really nice but I just can't get my head around
>paying £1.899-00 for a film SLR? 1900 nicker! phew
that's major wonga, how
>can Nikon charge that amount of money? what the heck is
this thing made out
>of?. Last time I
was in the camera shop the F4 was ruling the roost with a
>tidy price of about £1000. I will have to read up more on the F5. The F100
>looks like a £300 pound beginners camera, what does it
bring to the table
>over an FM3a?.
An F100 costs more than L300 - you must have it confused
with something else. The F100 is what I would choose for
best size/weight/price/features/quality combination, and
it can be used as an excellent full-manual camera when
desired, a full-auto (with lots of interesting "presets",
or a combination...
>If I didn't make it clear the Flash system is what I am
looking to get some
>computer assistance with, a real nice TTL fill flash is
what's required, 90%
>of my work involves *Drag Shutter* where I shoot at
about 1/8th-1/16th
>shutter speed and use the flash to freeze my
subject. It's taken me years
>to fine tune this manually but I still can't get it
right all the time.
The F100 flash-capabilities are extensive (rear-curtain
synch, with selectable TTL fill-ratio - available on a remote cord). BTW, I
would look into the new 24-120mm
f3.5-5.6 stabilized Nikkor ("VR") for what you
do...
(or a 24mm f2.8, 35mm f2, and 85mm f1.8 - all good,
fast lenses).
>Lastly something that I didn't mention is the need to be
able to *hand-hold*
>my flashgun, I don't like the light to be projected from
near the lens, I
>normally hold it in my left hand high up but pointing
down towards my
>subject (like one of those original plate photographers
that covered his
>subjects with soot!).
I looked into this set-up years ago and it wasn't
>possible to have the TTL flash *off* camera.
No problem now - and there are some nice tall brackets
available that flip for vertical photos. Look into
bounce flash, also, with a bit of near-lens front-fill...
>The auto-focus I need because as I hold my flash in my
left hand and SLR in
>the right it means I have to focus with just my two
index fingers, also
>sometimes I can't see my subjects as it can be very
dark, not an easy task,
>most times I have to preset focus using the distance
scale on the lens
>barrel.
I use prefocus with my 20mm and shorter lenses (works
well with lenses up to about 35mm), but the AF can focus
in the dark, with a red focus-assist beam on the flash
(almost any Nikkor flash SB-24 and after works fine).
>If I could set up this new camera on a tripod in a
night-club and get 99%
>perfect exposure I would be a very happy camper, at the
moment it is trial
>and error, and I have to resort sometimes to counting
out '1000 - 2000 -
>3000' etc while using the shutter on bulb - lol!
There is some appeal to the use of simple means...;-)
>Belive it or not I haven't owned a long lens since my
rock concert days, in
>my current field I rarely use anything over 24mm, ha the
50mm is my portrait
>lens (would love a 105mm). Nikkor lenses are damn
expensive, but there are
>quality! I
remember when I was younger and using my Pentax MX I used to see
>some other photographers using the then new FM2, I
always wanted to own one,
>and finally I got ot together to buy a 2nd hand kit back
in 1993 (I'm poor),
>it has really served me well and has paid for itself
1000 of times over,
>best investment I made and it is still going strong, had
maybe 2 services in
>10 years.
I drooled over the first Nikon F when it appeared - it took
a couple of years, but I got one, then another, then....;-)
BTW, for Nikkor lens evaluations, you might find this
interesting: www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/slemn.html.
>I have been living in the dark ages of modern
photography and I feel that
>now I can indulge myself in some state of the art (ish)
Nikon SLRs. . I'm
>not sure I can afford this but where there is a will,
there is a way! I
>gues I will have to keep reading. . . .
Good luck!