"Dennis Long" <dwlong@mchsi.com> wrote in message

news:v5v_b.375285$I06.4004677@attbi_s01...

> "David Ruether" <rpn1@no-junk.cornell.edu> wrote in message

> news:j8o_b.79887$IF1.13453@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...

> > > Okay guys, thanks. Why specifically do you like the Azden? And please feel

> > > free to elaborate under the assumption that I've never used an audio setup

> > > like this before. :)

> > The cheap Sony and Nady wireless sets were unacceptable

> > in terms of audio "disturbances" that were annoying; the Azden

> > set may still be subject to "swish" interference noises, but

> > these do not obliterate the wanted parts - and there are no

> > sharp "klunks", etc. to annoy... It is not that we like the Azden,

> > but that it is acceptable for some types of work, and it doesn't

> > cost the $500+ that better systems cost. I use two for safety

> > (or a mini-disc recorder instead), hooked up in "stereo"

> > with different frequencies, using simple small Radio Shack

> > adapters.

> > --

> > David Ruether

> How well does a wireless such as this work in conjunction with the

> regular PA system used with say a childrens stage program. Does the wireless

> lavaliere pick up the background PA causing any problems?

If you mean, is there a problem if the PA is also wireless and working

at the same radio frequency, yes, there will be a problem. If you mean,

is there a problem picking up PA output, there can be (mics follow the

same rules for gain, placement, EQ, and polar-pattern regardless of

whether they are hard-wired or wireless...).

--

David Ruether

d_ruether@hotmail.com

http://www.David-Ruether-Photography.com