On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:02:37 GMT, szekeresREMOVE@adelphia

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 05:02:37 GMT, szekeresREMOVE@adelphia.net (gregs) wrote:

>In article <3e7c4816$0$5550$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>, "Native_MetaL" <Nativemetal@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>>Hello im looking at buying a camcorder but ide like to find out whats good

>>and whats not .

>>anyone know of a good site with news and reviews?

>http://www.newsearching.com/digital_camcorder/digital_camcorder.html

>No news.

>Been using this myself.

>greg

This site appears to use regurgitated manufacturer

publicity-releases and ad-copy for their "reviews",

making them as useless as most US magazine reviews

for evaluating relative merits of camcorder picture

and sound...

Try these - they offer more "meat", and are not the

"Gee, this latest model is so-o-o-o nifty - and here

is where all the buttons are!" type common in US

magazine reviews:

www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/vid_pict_characts.htm

www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder-comparison.htm

www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/sony_dcr-vx2000.htm

www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm

http://www4.big.or.jp/~a_haru/index.html