"PTRAVEL" <ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote in message

news:cFmVb.21408$SQ2.5257@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...

> "lathem" <lathem@mindspring.com> wrote in message

> news:g_iVb.17102$GO6.5838@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...

[...]

> The 33's higher resolution is relevant only to still imaging, which is a

> useless feature in a video camera.

[...]

You have said this repeatedly in these NGs, but it is not true. The

higher pixel count can provide both better color and higher image

resolution in the motion-video image of 1-CCD models - though,

all else equal, it will also further-limit low-light range, and if not

well-implemented, it can increase motion-artifacting. In the case of

the TRV33, the image is better in good light than that of the TRV22,

(with little motion-artifacting) but its low-light range is more restricted...

--

David Ruether

d_ruether@hotmail.com

http://www.David-Ruether-Photography.com