"PTRAVEL"
<ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote in message
news:cFmVb.21408$SQ2.5257@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
>
"lathem" <lathem@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>
news:g_iVb.17102$GO6.5838@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
[...]
>
The 33's higher resolution is relevant only to still imaging, which is a
>
useless feature in a video camera.
[...]
You
have said this repeatedly in these NGs, but it is not true. The
higher
pixel count can provide both better color and higher image
resolution
in the motion-video image of 1-CCD models - though,
all
else equal, it will also further-limit low-light range, and if not
well-implemented,
it can increase motion-artifacting. In the case of
the
TRV33, the image is better in good light than that of the TRV22,
(with
little motion-artifacting) but its low-light range is more restricted...
--
David Ruether
d_ruether@hotmail.com
http://www.David-Ruether-Photography.com