On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 01:24:10 -0600, "Andrew McAllister" <amcallis@DELETEDIS.uiuc.edu> wrote:

>> is it

>> better to film in progressive or interlaced mode?

>

>My $0.02: I've heard the argument that shooting with progressive scan on

>reproduces an image that is more reminiscent of film. Film is not

>interlaced, obviously. Now, the color depth is still a big factor in

>differentiating video from film, and other factors.

>-- I can see the logic, but is this true?

If you like the relatively poor motion-handling

of film, then, yes, the "fluttery" look of PS-mode

video with motion when viewed on a normal TV just

may remind you of one of the shortcomings of film...;-)