"T
P" <tp@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:nsa6hv08mitrd8ppp53fut67nma169fa1u@4ax.com...
>
"Jim MacKenzie" <jim@dusykbarlow.sk.ca> wrote:
>
>I care. :) And I realize the limitations of my 20-35 at
f/2.8 and f/4. I
>
>shoot the lens at f/2.8 because I have to; if I don't, I stop down.
>
>Intelligent use of the lens gives me good results.
>
>
>
>I found the corner sharpness of my 28/2.8D to be extremely good. It blew
>
>away my 35/2, which is generally considered to be an excellent lens. Maybe
>
>I got lucky and so did Popular Photography, but I know a lot of other
people
>
>who share my enthusiasm for the lens, so I'm inclined to think you saw a
bad
>
>one. I have, however, never used
the AI-S. The D is certainly head and
>
>shoulders above the E lens, which I do know well.
>
Well said, Jim. My experience seems
identical to yours; my 20-35mm
>
was the best of the three examples I have tested and the 28mm f/2.8D
>
was simply amazing.
>
>
The AF 28mm f/2.8D Nikkor is not only a huge improvement on the very
>
good non-D version, but it also beats the excellent AIS version.
>
> I
rest my case.
The
"D" 28mm f2.8 AF I tried was an improvement over the non-D,
but was
not particularly good at the edges and corners, even stopped
well
down. Since it is a 6-element non-floating element "step-up" from
the
generally rather poor 5-element non-D AF and E, it's performance
was
about as expected: better, but not great. The AIS 28mm f2.8 is an
8-element
design that includes a floating element for better correction
with
distance changes, and as one might expect, it is a better performer
than
either of the AF 28mm f2.8s (though it is not perfect). And it does
give
surprisingly good images wide-open (as does the newer 28mm
f3.5 version
also), unlike the Nikkor 28mm f2 or f1.4 (or the AF 2.8s).
My
favorite of the bunch of Nikkor 28mm lenses for overall image
quality
remains the 28mm f4 PC, which surprisingly (along with the
28-70
f3.5-4.5 Nikkor) showed better backlight brilliance than the
AIS
f2.8 or the f1.4. The 28mm f2.8 D does show excellent contrast
and
brilliance, which can make the image look sharper than it really
is -
but, then, mebbe thet'z awl thet reely cowntz...;-)