"Tony Parkinson" <nospamnewsreplies@photoshot.com> wrote in message news:bkp96q$bjq$1@sparta.btinternet.com...

> "Ric Trexell" <rtrexell@vbe.com> wrote in message

> news:vmvbhmgj0sm3f5@corp.supernews.com...

> > you do have to wonder if old

> > E.R. wasn't right on one thing, that being Shell. Ric in Wisconsin.

> I don't "have to wonder" anything of the sort, nor do I wish to. The fact is

> we'll know for sure once a jury of Bob Shell's peers has decided on his

> guilt or innocence.

Unfortunately (either way it goes...), we may not...

Too many death-row inmates recently have been

proven innocent by DNA tests to have a lot of

faith left in the infallibility of jury decisions...

>To speculate in a public forum on his guilt or innocence

> until such time could be prejudicial to the case and as such, here in the UK

> at least, would be a criminal offence of "sub-judicy".

The first US constitutional amendment protects

us in our right to "blather on"...;-)

> I don't know what you hidden agenda is but please don't continue your

> crusade against Shell in this forum

While I agree with this, it has been tempting in these

threads related to BS to relate my disagreeable "run-in"

with him (in which "truth" was very "plastic"...;-), but I

have resisted. Those with the inclination to search google

or posts on my web site related to this may be amused...;-)

Withal, I wish BS justice, in whatever form that takes...

--

David Ruether

d_ruether@hotmail.com

http://www.David-Ruether-Photography.com