On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:16:13 -0700, "PTRAVEL" <PTRAVEL@cox.net> wrote:

>"Neuman - Ruether" <d_ruether@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>news:3e9e6054.2198850@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu...

>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:44:22 -0700, "PTRAVEL"

>> <PTRAVEL@cox.net> wrote:

>> >"Native_MetaL" <NativeMetaL@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message

>> >news:3e9bc669$0$1299$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

 

>> >> Hello i have a Question about CCD Pixels i keep seeing  referance to

>the

>> >> amount of pixels mini DV cam's have most of the single ccd cams are

>around

>> >> 800.00 to 1000.000 pixels while the 3ccd cam's only have 350.000 to

>> >400.000

>> >> so how is it that 3ccd cams have a better quality image on film ?

 

>> >To add to David Ruether's response, most 1-chippers are designed to do

>> >double duty as digital still cameras --- the extra pixels help the still

>> >imaging capability, but add little or nothing to video imaging, and

>almost

>> >always degrade the low-light imaging capability of the camera.

>>

>> The latter is true, but, "the high pixel-counts of some

>> can also help, giving higher overall resolution" and

>> better color in motion-video...

 

>That's true, but not on all 1-CCD machines.  I had a TRV-20 megapixel

>machine that had an awful time with diagonals and high-contrast horizontal

>lines; my VX2000, with 1/3 the pixel count (but 3 times the CDDs) is

>virtually artifact free in the identical conditions.  Also, I haven't seen

>any 1-CCD machine that can match the resolution of a 3-chipper, though it

>may be other parts of the system other than the CCD itself which is

>effecting the resolution.

 

OK, I guess I will quote MORE of my post, from WAY

above here...;-)

"... - and the high pixel-counts of some can also

help, giving higher overall resolution (though this is

unfortunately not without some drawbacks, like lowered

sensitivity and increased motion-artifacting...)."

In other words, the higher pixel count DOES affect

the motion-video (not just the stills-quality),

in BOTH good and bad ways, as I already said...;-)

And, the 1.5 megapixel TRV30/50-PC120 (and likely the

new 2-meg models) closely approach the resolution

of the VX2000, a rather remarkable thing for a 1-chipper.

See comparison frame-grabs (and comments! ;-) at:

www.David-Ruether-Photography.com/camcorder--comparison.htm.